So, when media reformers want your attention and use media techniques to get it, are they truly reformers? Or, are they as guilty as the media they so adamantly denounce, using the same spin and propaganda methods as Bill O'Reilly to create disinformation and issue distortion?
A topic such as media reform draws activists of all types. The reason is simple: Whatever it is that ails you, it's the media that must be blamed. As witnessed here, in the city that lays claim to birthing the civil rights movement, what's ailing
According to the literature circulating here in the
Beneath all these subtexts, the real news is media reform is now a hot topic. The controversy over internet neutrality, combined with the recent changes of who's in control in
Powell, as you may recall, wanted media ownership rules to change so that big media could get bigger. As someone at the FCC nonchalantly explained to me, media in this country is no longer a mom-and-pop-owned operation, so raising the cap shouldn't make a difference. The laissez-faire outlook by the commission, combined with Powell's infinite ability to offend anyone with a brain, resulted in a public outcry by more than 3 million Americans, including the Fair Media Council.
Actually, I think we owe Powell a debt of gratitude. If the public found him even remotely likeable, the media reform movement would not be happening.
Small coalitions are taking shape around the country.
Citizens want to know what they can do.
Celebrities are weighing in on everything from girls not being as visible as boys in films, as Geena Davis does, and George Clooney wouldn't be interested in playing Fred Friendly and producing meaningful works like "Good Night and Good Luck."
All in all, it's a good time to be in the chair I'm in, because things are going to get interesting. I shudder to use the "R" word, with all of its implications and baggage. I prefer "advocacy," since at least it implies something good may come out of whatever efforts are put forth. In the interest of full disclosure, you should know that, within the land of the reformistas, I'm something of a heretic. I actually believe we, as a society, are better off with media than without it. Sure, it's not perfect, but what is? Aren't we better as individuals and a country when we know what's happening on this planet? Haven't we bettered our lot by learning about different cultures and customs, myths and realities?
Now, I can't figure out if such a philosophy puts me so far to the left of the "R" types that they have to turn to their right to find me, or so far to the right they have to look left? Whatever. Actually, I prefer the fringe, anyway. It's worked for me thus far. Apparently, it's the reason for my viewpoint.
It's a viewpoint that was missing in



0 comments:
Post a Comment